PCI
done without on-site cardiac surgery backup was shown to be as safe as
procedures done with on-site backup in several registries. Yes, it is safe and
efficacious, but many still raise a question “does any patient prefer to have angioplasty done at a center without
surgical backup?"
Then
shall we open a cath-lab where there is no surgical backup? In 2011, CMS-TH,
Bharatpur established a cath-lab without any surgery backup. Should it be done?
I personally agree that there is a desperate need for PCI with no matter
surgery backup in remote areas where transit to regional centers is unreliable
and awkward. If a patient with acute STEMI collapses in our ER, then can we
take a risk to refer him to a surgical backup center that is approximately 6
hours far? So, I believe primary PCI
facility should be available in a timely manner irrespective of surgical
backup.
What if the patient needed
an emergency CABG? I argue, emergency CABG is required in only 0.2% of cases.
In one study, the
rate of emergency coronary bypass surgery, which was needed by 0.3% of patients
treated at centers without surgical backup, and by 0.4% of those treated with
on-site backup.
In
an effort to evaluate the introduction of PCI care at hospitals without onsite
cardiac surgery, the state of California instituted a pilot program comparing
PCI results in six pilot and 120 non-pilot facilities. The results of the study
were recently released on March 29, 2014—ACC 14.
The
study concluded that while pilot without onsite cardiac surgery hospitals
performed proportionately more primary PCIs than onsite hospitals and showed a
significantly better PCI composite safety endpoint, the pilot without onsite
cardiac surgery hospitals had worse composite efficacy endpoints than non-pilot
hospitals. Offsite hospitals perform more primary and fewer elective PCIs than
Onsite hospitals. Moreover, emergency CABG rates were low in both Offsite and
Onsite hospitals reducing the need for Onsite Cardiac Surgery. [PCI-CAMPOS
study]
We recently published a paper in JNMA.
Dubey L, et al. Percutaneous coronary intervention without
onsite cardiac surgery backup. J Nepal Med Assoc 2013;52(189):267-71
We concluded that despite having no cardiac surgery backup, in-hospital mortality and
other complications following PCI were acceptable in our cardiac
catheterization laboratory.